Cases 1 - 10 of 211
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRESLEY v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, LLOYD J SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DIRECTOR RICK JACOBS, VICE CHAIRMAN BRIAN OWENS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 7:2019cv00191
Defendant:
RICK JACOBS, BRIAN OWENS and TERRY E BERNARD
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES J HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, KEARINS, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. OWENS et al
as 5:2018cv00427
Defendant:
SABRINA SMITH, BRIAN OWENS, BRAXTON T COTTON and others
Plaintiff:
TERRIUS WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. OWENS et al
as 5:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
RANDY J HARMON, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, HODGES, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLISON v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Respondent:
JACQULINE BUNN, BRIAN OWENS, DAVID J HERRING and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
