Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DOWNING et al v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
TAVERN DOWNING, SR, DOLLIE A DOWNING, TYLIA DOWNING and others
Defendant:
JESSES THOMAS, PAUL MCDUFFIE, JOEL PRESLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. HARBISON et al
as 4:2019cv00152
Defendant:
MD KAMESHA HHARBISON, RNC KELLY MCNANY, RN CAITLYN DOWNS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVAUN COTTEN, KA CO and KETERIA SMITH
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
CLAY v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
ALFARUS JAMES CLAY
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, BROCK, HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downs v. Davita RX, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Amber N. Downs
Defendant:
Davita RX, LLC, Davita Accountable Care Solutions, LLC and Davita Medical Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Downes v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS DOWNES
Defendant:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWNING et al v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF MACON INC et al
as 5:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
TAVERN DOWNING and MARVIN WELLS
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF MACON INC , JOHN DOE and DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAYLES v. SMITH et al
as 5:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
WINSTON HAYLES
Defendant:
SMITH, CEDRIC TAYLOR, WELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARINGTON v. WALKER et al
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
MORRIS JEROME CLARINGTON
Defendant:
VICTOR L WALKER, DUNKEN, WESLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
James Conrad Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Kathy Davis, Scott L Downing, Richard N Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hartgrove et al
as 5:2010cv00436
Plaintiff:
Darran Walker
Defendant:
Hartgrove, Langford, Broom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
