Cases 1 - 10 of 78
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GULIANNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAYTON v. IVEY et al
as 5:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, SERGEANT EDWARD FLOYD, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. FLOYD et al
as 5:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
SERGEANT EDWARD FLOYD, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, SIKES, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD v. MALONE, et al.
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
EDDIE FRANK FLOYD, III
Defendant:
MS MALONE, OFC THOMPSON, Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. KNAPP
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
FLOYD REGINALD RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KATHRYN KNAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSSELL v. CALDWELL
as 5:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLOYD RUSSELL
Defendant:
WARDEN CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
