Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BUTT v. ZIMMERMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00214
Defendant:
BEN MARION, JACK PERRYMAN, WILL BACON and others
Plaintiff:
SOHAIL N BUTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYER v. DILLS et al
as 1:2020cv00075
Defendant:
MS BROWN, MS BRYANT, MR ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D DYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER, et al. v. SOUTHEAST CORRECTIONS LLC
as 7:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
GENEVIEVE LIVINGSTON, MACON REVILL, JUAN DELEON and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST CORRECTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
STONECREST INCOME AND OPPORTUNITY FUND 1 LLC v. LIVINGSTON et al
as 5:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
STONECREST INCOME AND OPPORTUNITY FUND 1 LLC
Defendant:
JOHN W LIVINGSTON, NATHAN J LIVINGSTON, MICHELLE L LIVINGSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOTT et al v. FYE et al
as 5:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
MACK HENRY LOTT, MIMS MICHAEL MORRIS, SR, LLOYD DARRYL WATKINS and others
Defendant:
CHIQUITA A FYE, HALL, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. LIVINGSTON, et al.
as 5:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROSS
Defendant:
Michael Livingston and WILLIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. Johnson
as 5:2011cv00185
Petitioner:
Mark Livingstone Noble
Respondent:
Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Scharf et al v. Mentor Corporation
as 4:2009cv05047
Plaintiff:
Carolyn D. Scharf, Susan Livingston and Noble Livingston
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Suzanne Crews et al v. Mentor Corporation
as 4:2008cv05000
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Crews, Suzanne Crews, Suzanne Crews and others
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation, Mentor Corporation, Mentor Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
