Cases 1 - 10 of 13
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REID v. EVANS et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
TYNASHA EVANS, SHARON STEMBRIDGE, TAMEKA CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
HOWARD v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
ERNEST HOWARD
Respondent:
CHIEF JAMES WARD, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER MICHAEL W NAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REID v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2021cv00099
Petitioner:
RHONDA REID
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GREENE COUNTY and MICHAEL W NAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
MICHAEL W NAIL, Georgia Department of Community Supervision, Sean Carroll Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Miller and JENNIFER L MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IOU CENTRAL INC v. DO et al
as 4:2019cv00199
Defendant:
HOANG M. DO, LUXE ENTERPRISES INC, LUX NAILS and others
Plaintiff:
IOU CENTRAL INC and IOU CENTRAL INC doing business as IOU FINANCIAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NITSCHKE v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS INC
as 1:2018cv00196
Defendant:
Kiss Nail Products, Inc. and KISS NAIL PRODUCTS INC
Plaintiff:
Dannette Nitschke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2018cv00121
Defendant:
KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGUYEN v. LE et al
as 7:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY NGUYEN
Defendant:
TRONG LE , VIVIAN LE and LE'S MODERN NAILS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2013cv00368
Plaintiff:
DESI LEE HYMAN JACKSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TELFAIR STATE PRISON, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
