Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PONDER v. BLOODSAW et al
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
GEORGIA BLOODSAW, DEMETRIUS SWINT, DANIELS CYNTHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PONDER v. DOES et al
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GREEN et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GREEN, LIEUTENANT CALLWELL, LIEUTENANT HOLIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PONDER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 5:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GOVERNOR BRIAN P KEMP, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN et al v. WHITE OAK PASTURES INC
as 1:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WESLEY, MORTON BRIMBERRY, CODY MILBURN and others
Defendant:
WHITE OAK PASTURES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PONDER v. BRANNON, et al.
as 5:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN PONDER
Defendant:
ROBERT BRANNON, SHAUN WILDER and WALMART NO 2890
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PONDER v. WALMART NO 2890 et al
as 5:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN PONDER
Defendant:
WALMART NO 2890, ROBERT BRANNON and SHAUN WILDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PONDER v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN PONDER
Defendant:
DAVID DAVIS, CLAY WILLIAMS and EDDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
