Cases 1 - 10 of 52
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
RODRIGUEZ-MEDINA v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ-MEDINA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, OFFICER WOOD and DOUGHERTY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ v. USA
as 4:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
ERNESTO RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES
as 4:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
ERNESTO RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHARLESTON v. GARY
as 5:2021cv00450
Petitioner:
RODRIGUEZ CHARLESTON
Respondent:
CAPTAIN JOHN GARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANFORD v. HOOD et al
as 5:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
Cameron Sanford
Defendant:
Steven Hood, Hermes Rodriguez-Alvarodo and HERMES RODRIGUEZ - ALVARODO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES et al v. LONG et al
as 5:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ S GATES, JABBAR PINKSTON and JAHLAND BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL LONG, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PELFREYS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVID HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
