Cases 1 - 10 of 533
SANDERS v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
OMAR SANDERS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MORGAN v. SHROPSHIRE et al
as 7:2024cv00076
Defendant:
DAVIS, DELISHA BRYANT, RALPH SHROPSHIRE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEIDENFADEN et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Defendant:
SANDRA FAYE DAVIS, COURTNEY NICOLE THOMAS and WALTER CLARENCE SEIDENFADEN
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
DAVIS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00237
Respondent:
TEKETA JESTER, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COLLECTIONS
Petitioner:
WILLIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00190
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PITTS, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, SHARELL F LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE RENARD FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Defendant:
VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, WAYNE BENNETT, CRYSTAL L MOON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Defendant:
DEREK WILKES, JOHN DOE, LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAINEY v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, SERGEANT JOHN AHLVIN and DEPUTY SHERIFF FREDERICK GRAY
Plaintiff:
JOZZI RAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
