Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MANRIQUE YARURO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00039
Plaintiff: ANDREA MANRIQUE YARURO
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, LASALLE SOUTHEAST LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHAPPELL v. WARNER ROBINS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2020cv00366
Plaintiff: XAVIER CHAPPELL
Defendant: WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA, OFFICER NATHANIEL CHARLES CRAIG, WARNER ROBINS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff: ALICE TAYLOR , DEXTER ASH , DONICE CHAPPELL, II and others
Defendant: BIG LOTS STORES, INC. and GARY BOATWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chappell v. Mclaughlin
as 1:2016cv00208
Petitioner: KELVIN G CHAPPELL
Respondent: MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMALLBIZPROS INC v. CHAPPEL
as 3:2016cv00112
Plaintiff: SMALLBIZPROS INC
Defendant: TODD CHAPPEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Chappell v. USA
as 5:2016cv00263
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: Carey Gilbert Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?