Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Susan E. Edlein, Assistant Solicitor Jamie Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
Willie J Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, The Fulton County Georgia, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
