Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Thomas Chorey, Jr., Daniel White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jackson v. Hennepin County Department of Human Resource and Public Health et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Nadia Jackson
Defendant:
Hennepin County Department of Human Resource and Public Health, Georgia Department of Human Resources & Public Health and Southern Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Muhammad et al v. City of College Park, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv02395
Defendant:
John Adams, Officer Gregory Verlander, Kirt Ziesman and others
Plaintiff:
Safiyyah Muhammad, Stanley Muhammad, Raeesah Muhammad and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
