Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Reaves v. National Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
National Law Enforcement, Bill Phillips, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Dwanye Lee, John Melvin, Michael Daniel Hucko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Knowlton et al
as 1:2022cv04765
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Carl Knowlton, Michael Cody Guined, Wendy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant:
Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Harpo v. Craig et al
as 1:2016cv03965
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig, Richmond County District Attorney, State Bar of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo v. City of Sandy Springs et al
as 1:2013cv04118
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
City of Sandy Springs, Fulton County Commission, Fulton County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. Department of Human Resources (DHR) et al
as 1:2007cv00845
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Hicks, Eddie Hicks, Jr. and Sylvernus Richard Osagu, II
Defendant:
Department of Human Resources (DHR), Richmond County Department of Family and Children Services, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
