Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Hensonz v. Whitfield County Superior Court District Attorney Office
as 4:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alfonso Hensonz
Defendant:
Whitfield County Superior Court District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensonz v. Whitfield County Sheriff's Offices and Correctional Department
as 4:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alfonso Hensonz
Defendant:
Whitfield County Sheriff's Offices and Correctional Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alfonso v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00847
Defendant:
John Does 1-10. and Cumulus Media, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dan Alfonso and Cara Chiappa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hensonz v. Delta Gas Station
as 4:2019cv00258
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alfonso Hensonz
Defendant:
Delta Gas Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Whitfield County Sheriffs Office and Dententioanl Jail's Medical Staff
as 4:2019cv00161
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alfonso Henson
Defendant:
Whitfield County Sheriffs Office and Dententioanl Jail's Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensonz v. Whitfield County Superior Courts et al
as 4:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Whitfield County Superior Courts and Public Defender's Office of Whitfield County of the City of Dalton, Georgia
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alfonso Heresong and Daryl Alfonso Hensonz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfonso v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05947
Plaintiff:
Julian Alfonso
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAfee v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2017cv01250
Plaintiff:
Alfonso McAfee, Jr.
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
