Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hunter v. Moulder et al
as 1:2022cv02256
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Bernard Hunter, III
Defendant:
Doyle Wes Moulder, Renee Vines and Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Brianna Millsaps and David Doyle
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bey v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv05176
Plaintiff:
Jamil Rasul Bey
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Charles D. Baker, Karyn E. Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. McMenomy et al
as 1:2021cv04849
Plaintiff:
Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles R. McMenomy, Tracy Drake, Melanie Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Board of Pardons et al et al
as 1:2021cv04850
Plaintiff:
Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.
Defendant:
Board of Pardons et al and Chair Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Board of Pardons et al et al
as 1:2021cv03601
Plaintiff:
Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.
Defendant:
Board of Pardons et al and Chair Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. McMenamy et al
as 1:2021cv03141
Plaintiff:
Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles McMenamy, Tracy Drake, Melanie Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. McMenomy
as 1:2021cv03101
Plaintiff:
Doyle A. Norwood, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles R. McMenomy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2021cv02012
Respondent:
Dept. of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
