Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Bradford Ridge Holdings, LLC v. The Cone Insurance Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03294
Defendant:
Tricia Curry and The Cone Insurance Company, Inc. doing business as The Cone Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bradford Ridge Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. Florida Adoptions et al
as 1:2020cv03112
Defendant:
Sandra Brooks, Thomas N. Fischgrund, St Petersburg General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Bell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Currie v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv02160
Plaintiff:
Richard Currie
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gresham et al v. Ryder Trucking Company et al
as 1:2019cv05113
Defendant:
James Barbieri, Ryder Trucking Company, Matthew Lewis Baisley and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gresham and Jasmine Batten
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wright v. Carr et al
as 1:2019cv04324
Defendant:
Gina Cheri Haspel, Angelyn Curry, Clarance Davis and others
Plaintiff:
NeGuerian Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cosby v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 1:2019cv02589
Defendant:
Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, LLP, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Thomas D. Martin
Plaintiff:
Anqous Cosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Curry v. Couch et al
as 2:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Eddie Curry
Defendant:
Gerald Couch and Dr. Linwood Zollar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergeron v. Multiple Numerous Unknown Agents of the State of Georgia inside Cherokee County Jail
as 1:2019cv01667
Defendant:
Blair, Curry, Turoczy and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
