Cases 41 - 50 of 771
Ledet v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Judge D.V. Reynolds, Judge Charles Chesbro and Haynie Litchfield & White
Presley v. Sales
as 1:2023cv02533
Petitioner:
George Presley
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zimmerman v. Gordon
as 1:2023cv02372
Plaintiff:
George Zimmerman
Defendant:
Alan Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Gueh v. George's, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01884
Plaintiff:
Tanneh Angela Gueh
Defendant:
Panda Express, Inc. and George's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Clark v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
George Lee Clark
Defendant:
Dr. Eben Alexander, III, Simon and Shuster, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Thomas Chorey, Jr., Daniel White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
McKinney v. GDC Mental Health Department et al
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. McKinney, James Ligon, Jr., George Kelley and others
Defendant:
GDC Mental Health Department, Timothy C. Ward and Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company v. Arnold et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shonett Arnold, Protect Security, LLC and George Chavier Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
