Cases 41 - 50 of 184
McCullough v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv05054
Plaintiff:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, Randy Akies, Cpt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv04970
Petitioner:
Michael Lydon Strong
Respondent:
Craig Owens, State of Georgia, All Officers and Employers of the State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Soras et al
as 1:2022cv04868
Plaintiff:
Drew Brooks
Defendant:
Lt. Soras and Lt. Etaridd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv04758
Defendant:
Jailer Lt. Washington, Sheriff Victor Hill, Chief Deputy Ronald Boehrer and others
Plaintiff:
Nasir Shakim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Fergueson et al
as 1:2022cv04763
Plaintiff:
Knazier Clarke
Defendant:
Deputy Fergueson, Sgt. John Doe, Craig Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sainthilaire v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv04703
Plaintiff:
Ruben Sainthilaire
Defendant:
Chief Jailer John Jackson, Major Jenkins and Lt. Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazelrigs v. Baker
as 1:2022cv04680
Plaintiff:
Randall Hazelrigs
Defendant:
Lt. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Riverbend Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv04682
Plaintiff:
Davious Boyd
Defendant:
Riverbend Correctional Facility and Lt. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Adams et al
as 1:2022cv04600
Plaintiff:
Steven Troy Thomas
Defendant:
Robert Adams, B.M. Wright, Sgt. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
