Cases 51 - 60 of 772
Rispoli v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv01959
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Rispoli, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. McKinney et al
as 1:2022cv03666
Plaintiff:
Corey Henderson
Defendant:
Derek McKinney and Darrell V. Mitchell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. LC Halsten LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
Larry Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
LC Halsten LLC doing business as The Halsten At Vinings Mountain, BH Management Services, LLC, Castlegate Property Group and others
SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2019cv02973
Plaintiff:
Eva Lathrop, Lisa Haddad, Carrie Cwiak and others
Defendant:
Andrew Reisman, LaSharn Hughes, Thomas Hardin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. Owens
as 1:2022cv03474
Petitioner:
David Raymond Berry
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Synchrony Bank v. Howell
as 1:2022cv03502
Plaintiff:
Synchrony Bank
Defendant:
Frank A. Howell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Brown v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv02956
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Ronald A. Pavlik, Keysha Thom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alston Sr. v. S. Gregory et al
as 1:2022cv03388
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Alston Sr.
Defendant:
S. Gregory and Dr. O Awe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
