Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hooper v. Cooksey
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Marshal Hooper
Defendant:
Jeremy Cooksey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05545
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hooper
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. The National Association of Realtors et al
as 1:2023cv05392
Plaintiff:
Janet Phillips, Joseph Hunt, Edith Anne Hunt and others
Defendant:
The National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., HSF Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hooper v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv02477
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooper v. Rabun County Detention Center
as 2:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hooper
Defendant:
Tony Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Holbrooks v. Colwell et al
as 2:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ryan Holbrooks
Defendant:
Carlton H. Colwell, Diane Hassett, M. Jablonski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrooks v. Butler et al
as 2:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ryan Holbrooks
Defendant:
Butler, Richards, Monkus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Wallace et al
as 1:2011cv01267
Plaintiff:
Maria Hooper
Defendant:
James E. Wallace and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
