Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Diarra v. Department Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
Department Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maya v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv02064
Defendant:
United States - Immigration Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and Kevin McAleenan - Secretary of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Maya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 1:2015cv02101
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garza v. Knight et al
as 1:2011cv03236
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garza
Defendant:
Lee Knight, Harley Lapin, M. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Palomera v. Immigration Customs Enforcement
as 1:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Saul Palomera
Defendant:
Immigration Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palomera v. Immigration Naturization Service et al
as 1:2008cv03738
Plaintiff:
Saul Palomera
Defendant:
Immigration Naturization Service and Immigration Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02968
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
