Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Macias v. JeJu Sauna and Gym, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02374
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Macias
Defendant:
JeJu Sauna and Gym, Inc.
Macias v. Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 1:2022cv03462
Plaintiff:
Jayro Macias
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice, Rockdale Regional Youth Detention Center, Wayne Dashield and others
Superior Business Management, Inc. et al v. Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP et al
as 1:2022cv02861
Defendant:
Anthony Smalls, Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP doing business as MGO LLP, Danielle Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Superior Business Management, Inc., Superior Tax Solutions, LLC and Kris Benson
Macias v. Unnamed Respondent(s)
as 1:2020cv03177
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent(s)
Petitioner:
Rosalino Solis Macias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harpo v. Howard et al
as 1:2016cv03876
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Burnice A. Howard, James H. Atkins, Cornelius Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014mi00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sanchez et al v. Sansom et al
as 1:2014cv02279
Plaintiff:
Omar Moreno Sanchez , Maria Macias and Natalie Sanchez
Defendant:
Robert J. Sansom , ABCO Transportation, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Macia-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00701
Petitioner:
Jose Macia-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. $527,100.70 in U. S. Currency
as 1:2008mi00073
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Movant:
Javier Macias
Defendant:
$527,100.70 in U. S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $527,100.70 in U. S. Currency
as 1:2008mi00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Movant:
Javier Macias
Defendant:
$527,100.70 in U. S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
