Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Archer et al v. City of Hampton et al
as 1:2024cv03306
Plaintiff:
Tammy Archer and Michael Cupp
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Hampton and Officer Mason Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Seal v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02117
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Atlanta and Officer Matthew Gordon
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. Barmettler et al
as 1:2024cv02115
Defendant:
Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Matthew Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Gordon, City of Atlanta and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Pitt v. City of Fairburn, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Myron Pitt
Defendant:
City of Fairburn, GA, Officer John Doe and Fairburn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dixon
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Police Chief Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Horne et al
as 1:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Sean George
Defendant:
Officer J. Horne, Officer FNU Deegan, Officer FNU Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Malone
Defendant:
Aaron C. Johnson, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
