Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02109
Plaintiff: Nadera Pittman
Defendant: United States Government
Pittman v. Atlanta Missions
as 1:2024cv02108
Plaintiff: Nadira Pittman
Defendant: Atlanta Missions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02051
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01937
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: Nicole Allen, Stockbridge Police Department and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01889
Plaintiff: Nadera Pittman
Defendant: Ali Brown and Demna Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv01851
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Georgia Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Jill Miller, Wayne Miller and Matthew Miller
Defendant: Georgia Department of Transportation, Pittman Construction Company and CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Pittman v. Belk, Inc. (DE)
as 1:2023cv05558
Plaintiff: Vernell Pittman
Defendant: Belk, Inc. (DE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?