Cases 91 - 100 of 21,717
TT Club Mutual Insurance Ltd. et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TT Club Mutual Insurance Ltd. and PGS USA, LLC
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Express Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Phelps v. Warden Perry
as 4:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Willie C. Phelps
Respondent:
Warden Perry
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kemoa Jones
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nichols v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Doretha Nichols
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Walmart Claim Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Floyd v. LVNV Funding LLC
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jeanna Floyd
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
NelNet Program et al v. Dooley
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
NelNet Program and Antonio Deshone Dooley
Defendant:
Antonio D. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Continental Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Chris G. Nicholson
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lockhart v. Mims
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Shawn Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
