Cases 31 - 40 of 322
Cobb v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Cobb
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castro v. Fikes et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Christopher Castro
Defendant:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Oranye et al
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chantel Antoinette Johnson
Defendant:
Achike Christopher Oranye, Pinda McCoy, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singleman, Christopher v. USA
as 2:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Singleman
Respondent:
USA and Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Nelson
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. White et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Warden J. White, V. Stewart, Sgt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Reid's Apocethary et al
as 2:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mejia
Defendant:
Reid's Apocethary and Christopher Gantt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Franks v. Danzy et al
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Franks
Defendant:
Sgt. Danzy, CO 2 Scott and CO 1 Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
