Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Woods v. Brunswick Circuit District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ralph Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Brunswick Circuit District Attorney's Office, Brunswick Circuit Public Defender's Office and Clerk of Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Wood v. Smith et al
as 3:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamar Wood
Defendant:
Hugh Smith and FNU Fuqua
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hollis v. Wood et al
as 1:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lyons Hollis and Teresa Lyons Hollis
Defendant:
Dewayne Wood and Joseph Peebles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Millwood Specialty Flooring Inc. v. Columbia Flooring Inc. et al
as 4:2008mc00026
Plaintiff:
Columbia Flooring Inc. and Millwood Specialty Flooring Inc.
Defendant:
Hoboken Wood Flooring, LLC., Hoboken Wood Flooring Corp. and Hoboken Floors
Walton v. Richmond County et al
as 1:2007cv00147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Denard Walton
Defendant:
Richmond County, Alonzo Bell, Horace Spratley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McDaniels v. C.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eric McDaniels
Defendant:
C.C.D.C., FNU Shouse, FNU Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. McDaniels et al
as 1:2007cv00097
Defendant:
Eric McDaniels, C.C.D.C., FNU Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Sellers
as 3:2007cv00038
Petitioner:
James Antwon Woods
Respondent:
Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
