Cases 81 - 90 of 21,744
Felton v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Jonathan Felton
Respondent:
Warden Andrew McFarlane
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felton v. McFarlane
as 3:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Jonathan Felton
Respondent:
Warden Andrew McFarlane
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Progressive Insurance
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Beanie Moss
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Spell v. County of Jeff Davis, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Spell
Defendant:
County of Jeff Davis, Georgia, Preston Bohannon and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gholston v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Deante Gholston
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Medical Director of GDC and Dr. Ditslear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oppenheimer v. Highlands Cottages, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Melissa Ann Woolf, Highlands Cottages, LLC, Missy Woolf and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Haskins v. The Hershey Company et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joy Haskins
Defendant:
The Hershey Company and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
