Cases 1 - 10 of 526
CARPENTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00212
Defendant:
Unit Manager Tia Fletcher, Zechariah Jones, Ricky Brown and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN CARPENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall v. State D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00064
Defendant:
State D.O.C., Jackson, Officer Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Deundre Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00136
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia and Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Holley Mary Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Scott v. Freeseman et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Defendant:
Penny Hass Freeseman and Shalena Cook Jones
Plaintiff:
Eric Kelvin Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Higgins et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jones
Defendant:
Judge James R. Tuten, Jr., Glynn County and Keith Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felton v. CS Atlanta, GA et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Defendant:
Jackson State Prison, John Does, Henry County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Felton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Raybun et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dawud Bashan Jones
Defendant:
Christopher Rabun and Kenneth E. Atterton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Jones
as 6:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Quentin Horton
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snell-Jones v. G.D.C. et al
as 6:2024cv00034
Defendant:
D.W. Thomas, Co. Ms. C., Buford and others
Plaintiff:
Zion Snell-Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
