Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Proctor v. Wan Hai Lines Ltd et al
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Proctor
Defendant:
Wan Hai Lines Ltd and Wan Hai Lines Singapore, PTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gardner v. Sikes et al
as 3:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Richard Gardner
Defendant:
Lt. Sikes and Hays Tactical Squad on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salaam v. Wan Hai Lines Ltd et al
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jafar Salaam
Defendant:
Wan Hai Lines Ltd and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Brockington v. Rigdon et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cameron Brockington
Defendant:
Randy Rigdon, Jeffrey Deal, Jordan Peavy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kilpatrick v. Hays State Prison et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Azavier Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Hays State Prison, Sprayberry, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hays v. Sapp's Wrecker Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jackie Hays
Defendant:
David Thompson, National Interstate Insurance Company and Sapp's Wrecker Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mosley v. Hai Feng 1710 Designated et al
as 4:2019cv00216
Defendant:
Hapag-Lloyd AG and Hai Feng 1710 Designated
Plaintiff:
Stanley Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. Hai Feng 1710 Designated et al
as 4:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Hapag-Lloyd AG and Hai Feng 1710 Designated
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armbruster v. Roosenbloom et al
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Clifford Armbruster
Defendant:
William Roosenbloom, Paul Baker, Rose Marie Kuhar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
