Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Turman v. Schroer et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gregory Turman
Defendant:
Kimberly W. Schroer, DHS, Division of Family and Childrens Services, Daniel A. Gaston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Geddie et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Hughes
Defendant:
Lewis Geddie and Warden Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Hughes v. Odum et al
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Hughes
Defendant:
Warden Roy Odum, Warden Cox, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hughes v. Horn
as 4:2019cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Hughes
Defendant:
Todd M. Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibson-Carter v. Rape Crisis Center et al
as 4:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Katie Joyner-Barber, Mark Revenew, Lynne Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Kesha Gibson-Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
