Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Eckert v. Owen
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Eckert
Defendant:
Jason Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Owens v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Austin Randy Owens
Defendant:
Officer HM Thornton, Officer Griffith and St. Marys Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Defendant:
Deputy Owens, Deputy Carter, Deputy Buton and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Tyquon Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Lt. Johnson, Officer Bess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
James Owen Cole
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cheek et al v. GL NV24 Shipping, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Southbound Expeditions, LLC, Timothy Cheek, Scott Owens and others
Defendant:
GL NV24 Shipping, Inc., Hyundai Glovis Co., G-Marine Service Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Owens v. Wong et al
as 2:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Larael K. Owens
Defendant:
Liberty Wong and Charles P. Rose, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ogbebor v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Owen Ogbebor
Respondent:
Warden Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sylla v. Kemp et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ebony-Azizi Sylla
Defendant:
Brian P. Kemp, Georgia Department of Driver Services, Spencer R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith - Germany v. Odom et al
as 5:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Quintarius Smith - Germany
Defendant:
Warden Odom, Deputy Warden Smoltz, Sgt. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
