Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Spaulding v. Dillman
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kwame Dalas Spaulding
Defendant:
S. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaulding v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Deputy Warden Webb, Warden Laughlin and others
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v. United States of America
as 6:2015cv00107
Petitioner:
Asha K. Spaulding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Leyland-Jones v. City of Brunswick, Georgia et al
as 2:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Brian Leyland-Jones
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Georgia , Cornell Harvey , Mark Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spaulding v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00317
Petitioner:
Shedrick Spaulding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kennedy Funding, Inc. v. City of Brunswick, Georgia et al
as 2:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Funding, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Georgia , Bryan Thompson , Jonathan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donnie Davis
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Caleb Duro Ajibade, Tim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkels v. Morales et al
as 3:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Winkels
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Tim Jones, Barry Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spaulding v. United States Of America
as 4:2010cv00027
Petitioner:
Niyonu Spaulding
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
