Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Goldsmith v. Marshall County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Keylynn Landon Goldsmith
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Department and Marshall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsmith v. Marshall County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Keylynn Landon Goldsmith
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Department and Marshall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Naph Care Inc et al
as 6:2023cv02017
Defendant:
Walter Dionnetay Marshall, Aimee RN, Desiree RN and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Dionnetay Buchanan Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ethan Lee Palmer
Defendant:
Brian Gardner, Pete Wilson, Patrick Reinert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02026
Petitioner:
Daniel W Harrington, Jr
Respondent:
US Marshals and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plasa v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02025
Defendant:
Adam Spray and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Plasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miles v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02024
Plaintiff:
Conny Miles
Defendant:
United States Marshal and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02022
Petitioner:
Darryl Fonte Jackson
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02021
Respondent:
United States Marshal and Adam Spray
Petitioner:
David Quinndale Wright, Jr. and David Quinndale Wright, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clutts v. Washington et al
as 1:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Clutts, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Marshal, Ty Duncan, Douglas J Strike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
