Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bullock v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Bullock
Defendant:
Jessica Doe, John Does I-XX, 119,873.29 U.S. DOLLAR COIN and others
Garnishee:
BAM Trading Services, Inc., BAM Management US Holdings Inc, Payward Ventures, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bullock v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Bullock
Defendant:
Jessica Doe, John Does I-XX, 119,873.29 U.S. DOLLAR COIN and others
Garnishee:
BAM Trading Services, Inc., BAM Management US Holdings Inc., Payward Ventures, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv03041
Defendant:
Jessica Doe and John Does I-XX
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garrett v. Doe (B) et al
as 2:2015cv01004
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Garrett
Defendant:
John Doe (B), John Doe (C), John Doe (D) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Parrish et al
as 6:2014cv02011
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Butler
Defendant:
Jimmy Odell Parrish, Shoals Transportation, LLC and John Does I-XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv04080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
FastServers, Inc. v. TLDS, L.L.C. d/b/a SRSPlus et al
as 1:2007cv00086
Plaintiff:
FastServers, Inc. and FastServers, Inc.
Defendant:
TLDS, L.L.C. d/b/a SRSPlus, COLO4DALLAS, L.P., HOSTFRESH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Fastservers, Inc v. TLDS, LLC (See [8] Dismissal of Defendants TLDS, Colo4Dallas, Hostfresh and Count I of Complaint)
as 6:2007cv02057
Plaintiff:
Fastservers, Inc and Fastservers, Inc
Defendant:
John Doe I and John Doe II - X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
