Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Fansteel Foundry Corporation v. Zamec, II et al
as 4:2018cv00304
Defendant:
Leonard M. Levie, Earl F. White, Fansteel, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
official committee of unsecured creditors and Fansteel Foundry Corporation
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0548
Garang v. City of Ames et al
as 4:2018cv00270
Defendant:
B. McPherson, J. Congdon, D. Johnsen and others
Plaintiff:
Ngong Kaw Garang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv00228
Defendant:
Eibeck, Tromos, Kenton County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khouanmany v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2017cv00438
Plaintiff:
Vilaychith Khouanmany
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RCD Enterprises, Inc v. Stubby's Real Pit Bar-B-Q
as 4:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
RCD Enterprises, Inc
Defendant:
Stubby's Real Pit Bar-B-Q, Scott Stubblefield and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Rossmann v. Bell et al
as 4:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Susan Bell, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Phillips et al
as 4:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerome Roe, Jr
Defendant:
Donald Phillips, Christopher Swoop, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coombes v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Coombes
Defendant:
Dollar Rent A Car, Jeff Lamb, II, City of Des Moines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monson et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 4:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Jay Alan Monson and Elite Commerce, LLC
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Farrand et al v. Stryker Corporation, et al.,
as 4:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Glenn Farrand and Diane Farrand
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
