Cases 101 - 110 of 24,334
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04078
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richardson v. Green
as 4:2024cv04079
Petitioner:
Jim L. Richardson
Respondent:
Brittany Green
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Reel
as 2:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Henson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Reel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Curry v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mindi Nurse, . Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaplin v. Crowder et al
as 3:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
William Chaplin
Defendant:
Ryan Crowder, Steven Snyder, David Greenwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Avalos et al
as 4:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
David Wilkerson
Defendant:
. Avalos, . Sheaff and . Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Central Laborers' Welfare Fund v. Robinson
as 3:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Central Laborers' Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Ferrell J. Robinson Jr., d/b/a F.J. Robinson's Contracting and Jr Ferrell J Robinson doing business as FJ Robinson's Contracting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Cisco v. Killian et al
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Andrew Killian and Matthew Fitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
