Cases 11 - 20 of 1,273
Attaway v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04085
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Cody Waterkotte, Jason Chenoweth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Reuter et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Scott Reuter, City of Decatur Illinois, K.G. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings
Defendant:
. Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risper v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Broderick Risper
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittney Greene, Brandon Llewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
