Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 51 - 60 of 24,485
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01224
Plaintiff: Bradley S Bell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walls v. Jumper
as 4:2024cv04105
Plaintiff: William Walls
Defendant: Shan Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdes v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01223
Plaintiff: Maria Valdes
Defendant: Walmart Inc. and Rhonda R. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marcure v. Chenyeon
as 3:2024cv03157
Plaintiff: Brannen C Marcure
Defendant: Jasper Chenyeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01220
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Ellis v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01222
Petitioner: Howard Ellis
Respondent: Anthony Wills
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swartz v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff: Henry Swartz
Defendant: Russell Owens, Kelly Nelson, Daniel Rainy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlick v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff: Cobretti Matlick
Defendant: William Zimmerman, . Stinder and . Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff: Jacob Ramos
Defendant: . Gonzalez, Kim .., Jody Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?