Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Link v. Dronenberg et al
as 1:2024cv01192
Defendant:
Julie .., Cheryl Hansen, . Alford and others
Plaintiff:
Kaz Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAdams v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 3:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Alexander McAdams
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv02022
Plaintiff:
Khristian Williams
Defendant:
. Williams, . Paige, . Spence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimbrell v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jody D Kimbrell and Jody Kimbrell
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, NA, Brian T Moyniham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kruger v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Kruger
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, . Mindi, Teri Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyjak v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2020cv03159
Defendant:
Rachel Link, Lana Miller, Melanie Kluzek and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Link
as 3:2019cv03028
Defendant:
Racheal Link
Plaintiff:
Henry Mallory, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Link
as 4:2018cv04172
Defendant:
Michael D. Link
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mann et al v. City of Urbana IL et al
as 2:2017cv02300
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mann and Samantha Wade
Defendant:
City of Urbana IL , Jennifer Difanis, Colby G Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Design Basics, LLC v. Armstrong Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01186
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC
Defendant:
Armstrong Builders, Inc., Armstrong Construction of Champaign, Inc., Armstrong Builders of Peoria, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
