Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Perkins v. Stephens et al
as 3:2024cv03248
Defendant:
Justin Stephens, Paul . and Xfinity
Plaintiff:
Danielle Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perkins v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv04172
Plaintiff:
Shamar M. Perkins
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, Rushville City Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christmas v. Appell et al
as 2:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
Michael Christmas
Defendant:
. Appell, E Senesac, P Denault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savory v. Cannon et al
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Lee Savory
Defendant:
William Cannon, Sr., Marcella Brown Teplitz, Stefanie Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv03234
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins et al v. Tazewell County Justice Center et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Perkins and Mark Turner, Jr
Defendant:
Tazewell County Justice Center, Stacey Kempf and Jeff Lower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Sandage
as 1:2021cv01026
Respondent:
Jon Sandage
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perkins v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv03267
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jamy Sue Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins v Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv03044
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jamy Sue Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins v Transamerican Corporation
as 2:2019cv02178
Plaintiff:
Judith A Perkins
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Transamerica Corporation
Defendant:
Cheryl D Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
