Cases 111 - 120 of 23,782
Daheya v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
Saber Daheya
Defendant:
Tom Dart, J. Danner-Lardino, C. Deanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Dart
as 1:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Jerome Simpson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01275
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Cochran
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Cole
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Medina Garcia v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Medina Garcia
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 3:2024cv50138
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary
as 3:2024cv50140
Petitioner:
Orlando Bell
Respondent:
Leavenworth Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pierritz, Jr. v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv50137
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Pierritz, Jr.
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Andrea Tack and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv50083
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Defendant:
Officer J. Smith, Officer B. Disher, Inmate Artavis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
