Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10817
Plaintiff:
Malique Clark
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Richard Smith, Uknown Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Travers v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv04816
Plaintiff:
Rishon Travers
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, Jahaira Lopez, Aramark Commissary/Food Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully Jr. v. Ditzler et al
as 3:2023cv50275
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully Jr.
Defendant:
C/O Ditzler, Olwenski, Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Redmond et al
as 3:2023cv50179
Plaintiff:
Wasim L. Clark
Defendant:
Redmond and Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hilliard v. Larry et al
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Andre Lee Hilliard
Defendant:
Warden Dr. Catherine Larry, CTOS Lt. Clark, Dr. Elizabeth English-Linsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Dave et al
as 3:2023cv50024
Plaintiff:
Wasim Lamont Clark
Defendant:
Chaplain Dave and Chaplain Laura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isom v. Clark
as 1:2022cv05269
Petitioner:
Brochers Isom
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv05260
Petitioner:
Jacer Medina
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. Clark
as 1:2022cv05179
Petitioner:
Vandaire Knox
Respondent:
Tiffany Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
