Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Alvarez v. Huber et al
as 1:2024cv04668
Plaintiff:
Aldo Alvarez
Defendant:
Kyle Huber and Carlos Vera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kamber
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Carlos A. Kamber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Galvan-Marcelo v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50365
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Galvan-Marcelo
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Soto v. Maldonado
as 3:2023cv50362
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Soto and Marcos Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nolano v. Vale et al
as 1:2023cv05820
Plaintiff:
Emelio Carlos Nolano
Defendant:
Officer Vale and Seargant Franzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05339
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Patrick et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04874
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Patrick
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Arnulfo Gomez, Chicago Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cregan v. Doe, et al
as 1:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dax Cregan
Defendant:
John Doe, Chicago Police Department and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv50129
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Blanchard
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Ganger, Blais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
