Cases 121 - 130 of 985
Adams v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50159
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Adams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
The Satanic Temple Inc. et al v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
The Satanic Temple Inc. and Adam Vavrick
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergeron v. Leisten et al
as 3:2023cv50148
Plaintiff:
Adam Ken Bergeron
Defendant:
Matthew Leisten and Kathleen Isley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron v. Braden
as 3:2023cv50139
Plaintiff:
Adam Ken Bergeron
Defendant:
Jayne A. Braden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2023cv03195
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta D Adams and Kenyatta D. Adams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi and Amy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv03617
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta D. Adams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Amy Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Bergeron v. Lynn et al
as 3:2023cv50184
Plaintiff:
Adam Bergeron
Defendant:
Jason Lynn, Bill White and Ashley Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Experian
as 1:2023cv03246
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Experian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adam v. Everett McKIenley Dirksen
as 1:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
Ronald Adam
Defendant:
Everett McKIenley Dirksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
