Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Bobby Curry v Pedro Guzman, et al
as 1:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Defendant:
Pedro Guzman, Emmet J. Welch, HA Mohammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becerra v. Curry
as 1:2022cv00580
Petitioner:
Cesar Becerra
Respondent:
Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Brosnahan et al
as 1:2021cv05708
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Defendant:
Mary Margaret Brosnahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv04090
Plaintiff:
Frank Curry and Frank G. Curry
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Curry v. Gallegos
as 1:2021cv00617
Defendant:
Timothy Evans, Kimberly Foxx, Joseph Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Respondent:
Evans, Amanda Gallegos, Executive Director, Cook County Jail, Bitar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Cook County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2021cv00452
Defendant:
Queen, Beachum, Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Cook County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2020cv07410
Petitioner:
Bobby Curry
Respondent:
Cook County Sheriff Office and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. King et al
as 3:2020cv50402
Defendant:
King, Bob Redmon and Owens
Plaintiff:
Sanchez Akeem Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. McEssy Investment Company et al
as 1:2020cv05591
Defendant:
Joanna Currie and McEssy Investment Company
Plaintiff:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morale Patch Armory LLC v. Does 1-281, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2020cv04776
Defendant:
Does 1-281, As Identified in Exhibit 2, militarypatch, coldwar_p and others
Plaintiff:
Morale Patch Armory LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
