Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley et al v. Lt Porter et al
as 1:2022cv04947
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley, Victor Short, Lashawn Norwood and others
Defendant:
Lt Porter, Charles Truitt, Wexford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurd v. Miles
as 1:2022cv03641
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Hurd
Defendant:
John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2, Jane Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naydenov v. Doe, et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Andre Naydenov
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey et al v. Ayers et al
as 1:2022cv02440
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Bey and Muhammad Bey Express Trust 1st lien holders and beneficial owners of MUHAMMAD LAWAL
Defendant:
Clarence D Ayers, Kimberly Abogunrin, Gerald E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wade v. Luster et al
as 1:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v The City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Iris Chavez
Defendant:
Chicago City of, Ricardo Mendez (Star # 18779), Star #14601 Jose Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Turrell Thompson
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David O'Neal Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Van Lines, Inc. v. National Van Lines Group et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
National Van Lines Inc
Defendant:
National Van Lines Group, John Doe Company #1, John Doe Company #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
