Cases 51 - 60 of 202
Hill v. X.O. CHISM, STAR NO. 12911 et al
as 1:2020cv04570
Defendant:
Unknown and Unnamed City of Chicago Police Officers, CITY OF CHICAGO and X.O. CHISM, STAR NO. 12911
Plaintiff:
Terrell Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jackson v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv03573
Defendant:
Officer A, Chicago Police Dept., Beat #3100 and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wesley v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv03189
Petitioner:
Terrell Dashaun Wesley
Respondent:
The State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Superintendent Jones-Hayes et al
as 1:2020cv01524
Plaintiff:
Anthony Terrel Dixon
Defendant:
Superintendent Jones-Hayes, Lieutenant Holmes, Assistant Sheriff Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbuckle v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2020cv01419
Defendant:
James D Wilcox, Garrett, Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Kely Y Arbuckle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv08114
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Cook County Medical Staff Division 10
Plaintiff:
Keith Terrell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell et al v. Boost Mobile
as 1:2019cv06897
Plaintiff:
Kamiria James and Kevinneshia Terrell
Defendant:
Boost Mobile
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv06369
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", topshop360.com, huanchengdonglu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
