Cases 71 - 80 of 1,030
Rogers v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv05270
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Clifford Martin, Gerald Jones, Kameisha Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinkley v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv05146
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Ofc. H Martinez, Ofc. Lakowski, Ofc. J Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Salgado v. Rogers Park Produce Co. et al
as 1:2022cv04606
Plaintiff:
Ruben Salgado
Defendant:
Rogers Park Produce Co., Peter Christopoulos and Nick Christopoulos
Fedorova v. Bank of America, N. A. et al
as 1:2022cv03486
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Defendant:
Bank of America, N. A., Brian Moynihan, Discover and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Coolab Foods, LLC v. Creamalicious, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03355
Plaintiff:
COOLAB FOODS, LLC
Defendant:
CREAMALICIOUS, INC., Elizabeth Rogers, Richard White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rogers v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50226
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Rogers
Respondent:
A.U.S.P. Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Santorelli et al
as 1:2022cv02503
Plaintiff:
Dan M. White
Defendant:
Dale Santorelli, Roger Thompson, Mike Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medley et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
Darius Medley and Chakoya Robinson
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
Mija Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calloway v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01795
Plaintiff:
Demeco Calloway
Defendant:
Tom Dart, St Yoksoulian, Stg Deberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
