Cases 1 - 10 of 1,037
Brown v. Sullo et al
as 1:2024cv03360
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Brown
Defendant:
G. Sullo, C. Fogg, Sgt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Del Rio et al
as 1:2024cv05036
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Aceves Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Del Rio and NJ of Joliet, Inc. d/b/a Specialty Auto care
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50233
Petitioner:
Julian Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Evans v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04944
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Evans
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, I. A. Rodriguez, R. Zhu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
John Rodriguez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Honey v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Devontae H. Honey
Defendant:
Lombardi, Rodriguez, Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Village Practice Management Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv02882
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Village Practice Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Botheroyd v. Metra Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02823
Plaintiff:
Clifford Botheroyd
Defendant:
Metra Police Department, Luis Rodriguez and Jose Monterrubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mundy v. Village of Summit et al
as 1:2024cv04277
Plaintiff:
William Mundy
Defendant:
Village of Summit, Sergio Rodriguez, Jerry Hurckes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Sunde, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
