Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Suarez v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv14156
Plaintiff:
Jose Suarez
Defendant:
State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Illinois Department of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe I et al v. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago
as 1:2020cv06486
Defendant:
The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, John Thuet, District 14 of CPS Schools and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, II and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eubanks v. Doe I et al
as 1:2018cv05609
Plaintiff:
Darrick Eubanks, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe III, John Doe I, Seneh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Cruz et al
as 1:2018cv03201
Defendant:
Casino Cruz and Board Of Education City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, I , Jane Doe, II , Mary Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe I et al v. Kane County et al
as 1:2017cv03944
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I , John Doe I , Jane Doe II and others
Defendant:
Kane County , Shawn Loomis and APEX3 Security LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Alsip Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv08713
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wright
Defendant:
Alsip Police Department, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elgin et al v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv08518
Plaintiff:
Andrew Elgin, Avias D White, Roy C Arroyo and others
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Gladyse C Taylor, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chan v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2014cv02332
Plaintiff:
Michael Chan
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Newman v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv08877
Plaintiff:
Richard Newman
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
